Their distinctions are many, but perhaps the fundamental difference between capitalism and socialism lies in the scope of government intervention in the economy. The capitalist economic model allows free market conditions to drive innovation and wealth creation; this liberalization of market forces allows for the freedom of choice, resulting in either success or failure. The socialist-based economy incorporates elements of centralized economic planning, utilized to ensure conformity and to encourage equality of opportunity and economic outcome.
In a capitalist economy, property and businesses are owned and controlled by individuals. In a socialist economy, the state owns and controls the major means of production. In some socialist economic models, worker cooperatives have primacy over production. Other socialist economic models allow individual ownership of enterprise and property, albeit with high taxes and stringent government controls.
The capitalist economy is unconcerned about equity (in the sense of equality). The argument is that inequality is the driving force that encourages innovation, which then pushes economic development. The primary concern of the socialist model, in contrast, is an equitable redistribution of wealth and resources from the rich to the poor, out of fairness and to ensure “an even playing field” in opportunity and outcome.
The capitalist argument is that the profit incentive drives corporations to develop innovative new products that have demand in the marketplace. It is argued that the state ownership of the means of production leads to inefficiency because without the motivation to earn more money, management, workers and developers are less likely to put forth the extra effort to push new ideas or products.
In a capitalist economy, the state does not directly employ the workforce. This can lead to unemploymentduring times of economic recession. In a socialist economy, the state is the primary employer. During times of economic hardship, the socialist state can order hiring, so there is full employment even if workers are not performing tasks that are particularly useful.
Some countries incorporate both the private sector system of capitalism and the public sector enterprise of socialism to overcome the disadvantages of both systems. These countries are referred to as having mixed economies. In these economies, the government intervenes to prevent any individual or company from having a monopolistic stance and undue concentration of economic power. Resources in these systems may be owned by both state and individuals.
Understand the main aspects of a capitalist system and how they contrast with the tenets of other types of economic systems, … Read Answer >>
Discover why the invisible hand of the market is compromised by socialist and communist economies, where the government controls … Read Answer >>
Hong Kong, Singapore and Australia are examples of free market economies. Read Answer >>
Read about three competing theories about the failure of socialism and command economies: human incentives, political corruption … Read Answer >>
Communism and socialism are umbrella terms referring to left-wing schools of economic thought that oppose capitalism. Read Answer >>
Take a deeper look at the role of government in a capitalist economic system and about competing ideas about the proper amount … Read Answer >>
Read more: What are the differences between capitalism and socialism? | Investopedia https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/020915/what-are-differences-between-capitalism-and-socialism.asp#ixzz54EcUl6Yl